Night Sky Santa Fe began with the goal of educating the public, the city council, and the mayor, about the importance of good city lighting design for resident and visitor safety & health, for the city’s historical and cultural ambience and tourist trade, and for the preservation of the area environment and the night sky we all share.
In pursuing that goal we discovered a number of inexplicable failures of city government and instances of executive mismanagement. Some of these we documented in investigative reports along the way: those reports are collected here. Others we are still documenting, or have not yet written-up: these will be described in periodic “blog” posts and included here as they are completed.
The fight for intelligent lighting continues! While the city has made a (we believe ill-informed) decision to go with 2700/3000 K lighting there are still many decisions yet to be made involving the implementation of that lighting. Making those decisions intelligently and thoughtfully can increase public safety, reduce the city’s carbon footprint and energy costs, and preserve the city’s nightscape. But, making intelligent and thoughtful decisions on any issue – be it city planning, the obelisk, the statue, the Bicentennial Pool, or street lighting – is not possible if city councilors are misled or misinformed.
The fight for intelligent lighting and the fight for good government are the same fight: stay tuned!
- The Request for Proposals/Bid process is how well-run cities and businesses get the best possible price for what they need or want;
- Santa Fe’s Department of Public Works shortcut the RFP/Bid process to contract with the unqualified vendor Dalkia for its LED streetlight upgrade;
- The Dalkia contract charged Santa Fe greater than 20% – and possibly greater than 60% – more than it is charging other cities who insisted on competing the work through the RFP/Bid process;
- Santa Fe’s due diligence failed to discover that the city was being substantially over-charged by Dalkia, even compared to what Dalkia was offering other cities where it had to bid for the same work.
- Santa Fe needs to revisit its contract with Dalkia and use the RFP/Bid process to get the best possible street lighting designer, installer, operator, and maintenance for the best possible price!
- City lighting design is complicated: it’s a job that needs an experienced expert.
- Santa Fe has engaged Dalkia Energy Solutions to design, install, operate and maintain its new city street lighting.
- Dalkia has never done a city lighting design in its entire history of existence.
- Santa Fe needs to hire an experienced and expert city lighting designer to ensure that it meets its goals of reducing the city’s carbon footprint and energy costs, and preserving the city’s precious nightscape.
Changing city street lighting is not as simple as changing a living room light bulb. Intersections, streets, and neighborhoods all have different needs. What’s right at one place – the right luminaire, the right brightness, the right shielding, the right light distribution pattern – is not necessarily right at another. And, it all has to fit together.
Do it right and you increase public safety, reduce the city’s carbon footprint and energy costs, and preserve the city’s precious nightscape.
Do it wrong and you place all these things at risk.
Urban lighting design is a job for experienced experts.
Santa Fe has engaged Dalkia Energy Solutions to design, install, operate and maintain its new city street lighting.
But, Dalkia has never done a city lighting design in its entire history of existence. Never, ever. Not even once. And, Dalkia has misrepresented its urban lighting experience to the Governing Body in at least two separate Governing Body meetings, fooling Mayor Webber, Councilor Romero-Wirth, and Public Works Director Wheeler.
Read more about who Dalkia is why Santa Fe needs to hire an experienced, expert lighting consultant, and re-evaluate its contract with Dalkia.
On February 15 the Council’s Finance Committee reviewed the financing agreement for the solarization, utility savings, and streetlight replacement projects. They approved the financing agreement for consideration by the Governing Body.
On February 24 the Governing Body approved the agreement.
Except, the financing agreement presented to the Governing Body was not the one reviewed and approved by the Finance Committee or the Public Works and Utilities Committee. No one told the Council Members of that substitution. What happened, and what does it mean?
- Requirements are your projects goals: e.g., energy savings, night sky protection
- Specifications describe what is needed to meet your goals: e.g., the properties of the luminaires you need to install
- Without requirements you can’t write specifications; without specifications you don’t know what to buy
What is “success” for the city streetlamp replacement project? How does “success” inform the choice of luminaires for the project? In early March we began a search for documents describing both of these. In April, Director Wheeler repeatedly said these documents exist and promised to provide them, but never did. Finally, in response to a public records (IPRA) request, the city reported there were, in fact, no project requirements, no luminaire specifications, and no evaluation of luminaires against specifications. This report describes the significance of that finding and the search leading up to it.